5/31/2007

EPO to keep the Indian BPO story rolling

NEW DELHI: India's engineering process outsourcing (EPO) business would grow 10-fold over the next seven years to touch $30 billion and make the country a major hub in this area, says a study released on Friday.
"The estimated demand for engineering process outsourcing to India has grown at 30-35 per cent since 2004-06," said the study released here by Commerce Minister Kamal Nath, adding the momentum would be sustained in the ensuing years.

The global EPO market, on the other hand, will grow to around $110-$140 billion by 2015, taking India's share to 20-27 percent, said the study conducted by the state-run Engineering Export Promotion Council (EEPC).

According to EEPC chairman Rakesh Shah, engineering exports from India touched $26 billion in 2006-07 but expressed concern over the decision to do away with the duty entitlement passbook scheme, an export incentive programme, next year.

But Kamal Nath assured that the government was working to develop an alternative duty neutralisation scheme that would replace the current scheme to be in tune with the norms set by the World Trade Organisation.

The minister asked the engineering exporters to use the focus market scheme to their advantage in promoting exports to the identified markets, especially to the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS).

As many as 16 new destinations, including CIS, had been included this year in the focus market list and exporters will find it useful to concentrate on developing the markets in these countries, Kamal Nath added.

"Indian exports including engineering exports are likely to face increased non-tariff barriers, considering that average tariffs for industrial products in all countries is headed southwards," he warned.

"This process has already begun for engineering products and is likely to gain greater momentum as India's share in the world exports increases in the coming years."

5/30/2007

Effort BPO to set up call centre in China

Mumbai based domestic call centre Effort BPO Ltd on Wednesday announced that the company has entered into a joint venture with China-based firm Asia Star and Hong Kong based Triple Three to establish a domestic call centre in China. The three partners will initially invest $1 million and will increase this to $ 6 million over a period of two years.

“Effort BPO will be holding 51% equity stake while Asia Star will own 24% and Triple Three 25%,” said Akshay Chabra, MD of Effort BPO.






The new venture will target about 1,000 seats and will take over Asia Star’s call centre business in Shanghai. The partners are looking at raising the employee strength to over 5000 over a period of three years. Triple Three will contribute its expertise in the financial, administrative and local understanding of the Chinese market. The JV will also add new facilities in the special economic zones (SEZs) in China, apart from the present one in Shanghai.

“With the present facilities in Delhi, Indore, Pune and Mumbai and with a total of 1,045 employees, Effort BPO plans to add 2,000 seats in Mumbai and Delhi and would target around 6,000 seats by March, 2009,” said Chabra.

He further revealed, “Apart from China the company is also looking at setting up a call centre facility in Vietnam and is scouting for partners for the JV. Moreover, we also have plans to go public in 2009,” he added.

Global BPO biz may slow to 2% growth

CHENNAI: Global business process outsourcing sector is likely to see only a modest growth of 2% in 2007, after growing at a compounded annual rate of 14% during the last five years, going by some of the recent indicators, according to a senior industry observer.

Mr Indraneel Banerjee, project director, Technology Partners International, a sourcing advisory firm, said the first quarter of 2007 saw the lowest number of contracts signed since the first quarter of 2003. The contract value was also the lowest since the third quarter of 2002.

There was also a shift away from large multi-process BPO agreements to single function contracts of a smaller size, he said. He was speaking at a seminar “The Changing BPO Landscape: Can India become a knowledge services hub?” organised by Nasscom on Wednesday in Chennai.

While TPI saw a softening of growth in BPO globally, it was positive about the potential of knowledge services outsourcing in India. Mr Banerjee said, “Contrary to the first wave of outsourcing, which was based on data transactions, the focus now is adding business value to a client, to enable their entry into new markets. Innovation is the key factor in knowledge-centric outsourcing”

Mr Lakshmi Narayanan, chairman, Nasscom, and vice-chairman, Cognizant Technology Solutions said that often BPO companies move up the value-chain driven by demand that comes from customers. In response, they build the capabilities to service those demands. BPOs also move up the value-chain by proactively coming up with solutions.

In a customer-driven model, pricing is usually based on (full time employees) dedicated to the project. In the competence-driven model, BPOs had a greater flexibility in pricing. Here, pricing could be based on the value added to the business, he said.

The seminar witnessed participation from offshoring companies like HP BPO, Ajuba Solutions India, Scope International and Pangea3 Legal Database Systems. The speakers contended that though the KPOs offer immense potential for India in the out-sourcing industry, this innovation-driven model would require a high degree of investment in domain and process capability and also employees with specialised skill-sets.

Also, the pricing model would move from being resource-based to value-based. The KPO sector also faces challenges like security, innovation and attrition. Security was especially a matter for concern among players in healthcare and the legal outsourcing arena.

Mr Devendra Saharia, president, Ajuba Solutions said, “Apart from financial data, we also deal with patient details, which is highly sensitive. In healthcare, R & D productivity is the key rather than the earlier phase where it was only claims processing.”

Nasscom has chalked out initiatives to help IT/ITES tackle. Mr Lakshmi Narayanan said, “We encourage educational institutions and industries to develop a finishing school-oriented programme. Apart from encouraging entrepreneurial activity, this would also act as an effective interface between the academia and industry.”

Mumbai firm to train Chinese staff on BPO ops

MUMBAI: First, it was the software companies; now, it is the turn of BPOs to set up shop in China. Effort BPO, based in Mumbai, has been roped in by Asia Star, a private Chinese telecom services company, and Triple Three, the investment arm of Hong Kong-based export company Mulitex, to set up domestic BPO operations in Shanghai.

Effort will partner with Asia Star and Triple Three to set up a 1,000-seater BPO operation catering to domestic companies in China. The yet-to-be named new venture would see an initial investment of $ 1 million, with another $ 6 million to be invested in the company over the next two years, according Gene Chu, CEO, Asia Star. Effort will hold 51% equity in the venture while Asia Star and Triple Three will hold 24% and 25% respectively.

“China lacks trained manpower for telemarketing. Call centres and BPOs are really the missing link in the value chain for the growing service industry in the country; hence, with this new entity, we would look to have a first-mover advantage in the space in China,” Mr Chu added.

Effort will train the Chinese speaking staff in the newly-formed BPO on running operations. “Effort would bring in the technology and domain expertise in running a BPO, while Asia Star would leverage its expertise in the telecom space, infrastructure and local knowledge,” Effort’s director-sales and marketing Rajnish Sarna told ET. HSBC, Reliance Telecom and Tata Indicom are its clients.

Effort is also aiming to scale up headcount in the new operations to nearly 5,000 in the next three years, he said. In India, the firm has operations in Mumbai, Indore, Delhi and Pune with about 2,000 employees.

Mr Sarna added that the new venture would also take over Asia Star’s existing 100-seater call centre in Shanghai. He added that the synergies with Asia Star were obvious since it is one of the only four companies in China to have a government licence to run a BPO/call centre.

5/28/2007

Outsourcing V/s Offshore Outsourcing

While Outsourcing stands for giving out a part or certain parts of your business operations to a regional or local distinct business entity, offshore outsourcing implies delegation of the selected business operations to an offshore location outside the country.

The two concepts share some advantages and differ on others. The common benefits of outsourcing and offshore outsourcing include doing away with the burden of mundane business operations that can be easily and skillfully handled at an off-site location, generally for a lesser budget. Outsourcing is a brilliant idea to relieve the business entity from vain exertion and instead pay better attention to ones specialized services areas or may be provide more agile customer care. Also, outsourcing excuses the enterprise from the substantial set up costs, viz. the cost of work space, manpower, stationery, systems and other miscellaneous expenses that would otherwise incur, if the jobs are not outsourced.

While local outsourcing manages just a couple, offshore outsourcing comes with a whole baggage of advantages. The highlights of offshore outsourcing remain the niche economies available at the offshore location, including exceptional professional talent for considerably lower costs. In fact, inspired by the dynamism of offshore outsourcing model in India, not less than 40% of the Fortune 500 companies are already taking advantage of it, including big names like MicroSoft, Motorola, Oracle, GE and Lucent.

Economies of scale is another citable advantage from Offshore outsourcing, as offshore destinations generally conduct themselves as specialized ventures that also take up similar jobs from other companies across the globe. As statistics has it, offshore outsourcing can bring down the costs for you from 50% to 30%, subject to onsite and offshore resources.

Offshore outsourcing also allows you to make a careful choice as regards the standard timeframe on offer, so as to render the effective working hours almost round the clock. For example, IST and EST are complimentary in nature with around nine and a half hour difference. This in turn, considerably shrinks delivery time for US-based companies translating into achievement of business targets well within budget and sped up job schedule.

Moreover, offshore outsourcing can span across wholesome backend business operations; the most prominent of all being IT and IT enabled services (ITES) with a whopping 28% of the entire share. As per reliable reports, majority of IT based outsourcing contracts are already moving to India, in spite of competitive rates offered by China and Russia. India offers wider talent and more purchasing power for US dollar, in turn saving billions of dollars for its US counterparts.

Where does China stand in BPO race?

ttrition of employees in other offshore locations like India, would be deeply disappointed by China's slowing offshore drive.

China's intension to be favorite alternative BPO hub for MNCs remains a distant dream as it is developing slower than expected.

Though the Chinese government came out with supportive ordinance to promote BPO in the country with huge level of visibility on the global arena, Chinas offshore market has not taken off as expected and it still seems a long way before it could claim to be of any potential alternative to India, as reported by technology research firm Forrester on Thursday.

Forresters Vice-President John McCarthy said "When China was looked upon as an alternative to offshore two years back, it was widely considered as a key contender to challenge India's dominance on offshore business. However, the latest finding reveals an opposite story, which says, "China has still more to prove,"

McCarthy, in 2002 had predicted that over three million BPO jobs in the US would go offshore, has also opinioned that firms with large bases in India should consider other geographies when addressing the risk mitigation issue. Countries like the Brazil, Mexico and Philippines as better alternatives than China in terms of skills, language and convenience.

Forrester in its finding clarifies that Chinas overall offshore resources has dropped and other countries are growing at a rapid pace. The need of the hour for the country is to refurbish its offshore efforts.

Instead of trying to compete in areas like application development and management, where India clearly dominates, China should encourage its local firms to focus on other areas like testing, data management and product development services.

Chinese firms also need to implement strict intellectual property controls... .

India being Bangalored by China

The dragon poses a clear danger to India’s outsourcing industry

A faint rumble may, on occasion, give forewarning of a continental shift of momentous significance. For BeyondCore, Inc. CEO Arijit Sengupta, an expert on eBusiness standards, it’s a surge in the volume of business enquiries in recent weeks from China, where his California-based technology company doesn’t yet have a presence. That alerted him to a shift of the tectonic plates of outsourcing from India to China.

Sengupta told DNA: "In recent weeks, I’ve received cold calls from Chinese BPOs who found BeyondCore over the Internet while looking for new technologies to reduce their operating costs and improve the the quality of their output. Over the past three years, I’ve never received a cold call from an Indian BPO!"

It’s not just about cold calls: hard facts too make the point forcefully that India, today’s undisputed leader in outsourcing services, is gradually being, well, Bangalored by China. The Global Outsourcing Report, which ranks countries based on their opportunities, costs, and risks in relation to IT offshoring, predicts that by 2015, China, currently placed second, will have taken over the No 1 spot from India.

From all accounts, companies looking to outsource critical services have already begun the Long March from India to China. Last year, faced with 15 per cent-a-year escalations in the cost of offshoring IT services to India, British Telecom took a giant stride over the Great Wall of China — and set foot in the outsourcing destination of the future.

And among mid-sized corporations in the US, there is virtually an avalanche of interest in relocating from India to China. Remi Vespa, a California-based veteran of the outsourcing industry, told DNA: "Over 50 per cent of my prospects — mostly mid-sized corporations — currently outsource to an Indian provider, and are considering changing."

In Vespa’s estimation, Indian leaders — like Infosys and TCS — are so far ahead of their Chinese counterparts that even 10 years from now, their standing won’t be seriously threatened.

"If we look at the top 10 companies in the outsourcing market in 10-15 years, I have no doubt that six or seven of them will still be Indian… But China as a whole will have taken over from India as the leading outsourcing destination."

What’s driving this exodus? China, says Vespa, has taken a "very smart road to catch up with India". The way it does it is by offering a whole package of incentives to attract industry leaders: allowing wholly owned foreign entities, creating over 500 science parks, offering tax breaks. In his reckoning, it is this that has led Google, Microsoft and Apple to shift their outsourcing focus from India to China.

China’s outsourcing ambitions are backed by a healthy dose of central planning. Under the 6th Five-Year Plan, China aims to build service outsourcing bases in 10 cities, encourage 100 multinationals to outsource services from China, and foster 1,000 large- and medium-sized service outsourcing enterprises.

Ironically, at about the same time that China is introducing significant tax incentives and other benefits to promote BPO, in India, policy initiatives have gone the other way — towards increasing taxes!

In addition, notes Sengupta, the Chinese BPO industry has a "secret weapon": labour efficiency. "A significant portion of the Chinese BPO industry serves domestic Chinese customers. They do not have labour-cost advantages relative to their customers and have to be very cost-efficient. If Chinese BPOs now start serving US customers and gain the additional advantage of the labour cost difference, they may turn out to be very credible competitors indeed."

On the other hand, notes Sengupta, Indian BPOs have enjoyed such a large labour cost difference relative to their customers that they have not had to be as cost-efficient. "With the exception of some leading BPOs, one theme I’ve noticed with many Indian BPOs is an attitude of ‘Why do I need the latest software or technology? Labour is cheap, so I’ll have 20 people write similar software internally or just allocate 10 people to do the task that I could have automated with the appropriate technology.’ I characterise this as ‘throwing people at the problem’. Is it surprising that most of the key problems that the Indian BPOs face relate directly to labour: churn, salary growth, and training costs?"

Of course, the flip side of this argument, according to Sengupta, is that if Indian BPOs start focussing on efficiency and technology adoption, they may become even more competitive.

Vespa points to a deeper problem that companies outsourcing their work to Indian service providers face today. "Apart from the top Indian players, the thousands of smaller companies have a very bad reputation. They have a high attrition rate: you work with a company, and six months later, it’s gone — or its key staff have left to start their own company and want your contract!" He believes it’s important for India’s outsourcing industry to "introduce some order" in this particular market segment of small-to mid-sized outsourcing providers.

Sengupta too believes that the Indian BPO is at a defining moment. "Clayton Christensen, the author of Innovator’s Dilemma, describes how the integrated steel companies in North America were rapidly disrupted and eventually driven out of business by steel mini-mills.

Likewise, the British used to dominate the motorcycle industry, but the Japanese disrupted them very quickly. In both cases, the incumbents were initially overconfident about their strengths relative to the disruptors until it was too late. I fear that the same is happening today as regards Indian attitudes to Chinese BPOs.

If India wakes up to this threat, I believe it can compete effectively. If it does not, then eventually it will cede its leadership in the global service market and whether that happens in five years or ten, it will be catastrophic for the Indian economy."

New Delhi, May 24: China's push to become an alternate offshoring hub for MNCs tackling soaring wages and high attrition rate in India remains a distant dream as its market is developing slower than expected, a study says.

Despite massive government support and huge visibility on the global arena, China's offshore market has not taken off as expected and still has a long way to become a potential alternative to India, technology research firm Forrester said in a report released today.

Multinational firms, considering China as a "quick-fix" solution to deal with rising costs and high attrition in other offshore locations like India, would be sorely disappointed by the country's slowing offshore momentum, the report said.

"When we first looked at china's offshore and it services Global Delivery Model (GDM) nearly two years ago, the country was widely viewed as the key challenger to India for offshore supremacy. However, the market has not taken off as expected," Forrester's vice-president John Mccarthy said.

He said while Japanese firms were more aware about China's potential, those from the US and Europe have been slow to respond. "In fact, China's percentage of GDM resources for top services firm like accenture has dropped, while India and the Philippines have seen far greater investment," he said.

Mccarthy, who had predicted in 2002 that over three million BPO jobs in the US would go offshore, added that firms with large bases in India should consider other geographies when addressing the risk mitigation issue.

Even countries like the Philippines, Mexico and Brazil could prove to be better alternatives than China for diversifying offshore exposure in terms of skills, language and convenience, he added.

Forrester also said like India, China also faces similar problems of attrition, increasing wages and lack of experienced manages and technical leads. In addition, the appreciation of the Yuan against the dollar was hurting margins of companies outsourcing their work to China, it said.

"The consensus among interviewees was that China still has not overcome clients' concern about limited English skills, attrition and weak intellectual property protection. One executive went so far as to say that China had to be 20 per cent cheaper than India to be viable," the study said.

Noting that china's percentage of overall offshore resources has dropped and other countries were growing at a faster pace, Forrester said the country needs to refocus its offshore efforts.

Instead of trying to compete in areas like application development and management, where India dominates, China should encourage local firms to focus on other areas like testing, data management and product development services.

For other countries vying for the lucrative offshoring pie, Forrester suggested economic development agencies in Thailand, Malaysia, Egypt and Morocco that they need to do more than just re-labelling the pool of engineering graduates as being ready to export their services.

"Their education programmes ought to focus on advanced skills like project management and advanced architecture skills, while at the same time, respective governments should invest significant funds to market the country as an alternative to the offshore incumbent - India," Mccarthy said.

Bureau Report

5/26/2007

India still ahead of China in offshore market

China’s offshore market is developing slower than expected. A recent Forrester report says it’s still a long way off from becoming any competition to India as an alternative BPO hub for MNCs tackling soaring wages and high attrition rate. All that government support and huge visibility in the global arena notwithstanding, China’s offshore market has not taken off as expected, the report says. Multinational firms, considering China as a “quick-fix” solution to deal with rising costs and high attrition of employees in other offshore locations like India, would be sorely disappointed by the country’s slowing offshore momentum, the report said.

“When we first looked at China’s offshore and global delivery model nearly two years ago, the country was widely viewed as the key challenger to India for offshore supremacy. However, our latest research shows that to date, the market has not taken off as expected,” Forrester’s Vice-President John McCarthy said.

McCarthy, who had predicted in 2002 that over three million BPO jobs in the US would go offshore, added that firms with large bases in India should consider other geographies when addressing the risk mitigation issue. Even countries like the Philippines, Mexico and Brazil could prove to be better alternatives than China for diversifying offshore exposure, McCarthy said. “The Philippines, Mexico and Brazil may provide better alternatives than China in terms of skills, language and convenience,” he added.

Noting that China’s percentage of overall offshore resources has dropped and other countries were growing at a faster pace, Forrester said the country needs to refocus its offshore efforts. Instead of trying to compete in areas like application development and management, where India clearly dominates, China should encourage its local firms to focus on other areas like testing, data management and product development services.

Chinese firms also need to implement strict intellectual property controls and undertake training programmes, McCarthy said. For other countries vying for the lucrative offshoring pie, Forrester suggests economic development agencies in Thailand, Malaysia, Egypt and Morocco that they need to do more than just re-labelling the pool of engineering graduates as being ready to export their services. “Their education programmes ought to focus on advanced skills like project management and advanced architecture skills, while at the same time, respective governments should invest significant funds to market the country as an alternative to the offshore incumbent - India,” McCarthy said.

Reliance in DTH arena

Reliance Bluemagic has become the fourth private player to secure a licence to offer direct to home (DTH) services and plans to start operations by the fourth quarter of this year. Reliance Anil Dhirubhai Ambani Group (R-ADAG) president AN Sethuraman and the ministry of information and broadcasting director Arvind Kumar signed an agreement in this regard. The other three players in the DTH space are Dish TV, Tata Sky and Sun TV.

Noida shootout

The shootout at Noida-based HCL BPO on Thursday has once again raised questions about security at BPOs. HCL chairman Shiv Nadar, who visited the Noida facility on Friday. “We have reviewed the security set-up and realise that there are 11 domains of security and 126 check-points. But it’s like making safe cars. It doesn’t mean there will be no accidents,” said Saurav Adhikari, corporate vice president-strategy, HCL.

The BPO is considering installation of metal detectors and is working on strengthening its internal surveillance systems. Mr Adhikari admitted a young industry has its own pros and cons. “People are working under stressful conditions and they are often away from their homes in a big city. There are undercurrents that are not easily detected,” Mr Adhikari said. HR managers in leading BPOs say the sector is targeted for such freak incidents, and the best way to improve things is to strengthen the hiring process. However, Nasscom president Kiran Karnik thinks differently. “There is a need to look at the level of violence and intolerance in the society, rather than develop a false correlation of youth with stress and BPOs with crime. It’s crazy that guns are so easily available in the country,” he said.

China lags far behind India in BPO sector

NEW DELHI: China's push to become an alternate Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) hub for MNCs tackling soaring wages and high attrition rate in India remains a distant dream as its offshore market is developing slower than expected, a study says.

Despite significant government support and huge level of visibility on the global arena, China's offshore market has not taken off as expected and still has a long way to become a potential alternative to India, technology research firm Forrester said in a report released on Thursday.

Multinational firms, considering China as a "quick-fix" solution to deal with rising costs and high attrition of employees in other offshore locations like India, would be sorely disappointed by the country's slowing offshore momentum, the report said.

"When we first looked at China's offshore and global delivery model nearly two years ago, the country was widely viewed as the key challenger to India for offshore supremacy. However, our latest research shows that to date, the market has not taken off as expected," Forrester's V-P John McCarthy has said.

McCarthy, who had predicted in 2002 that over three million BPO jobs in the US would go offshore, added that firms with large bases in India should consider other geographies when addressing the risk mitigation issue.
Even countries like the Philippines, Mexico and Brazil could prove to be better alternatives than China for diversifying offshore exposure, McCarthy said.

"The Philippines, Mexico and Brazil may provide better alternatives than China in terms of skills, language and convenience," he added.

Noting that China's percentage of overall offshore resources has dropped and other countries were growing at a faster pace, Forrester said the country needs to refocus its offshore efforts.

Instead of trying to compete in areas like application development and management, where India clearly dominates, China should encourage its local firms to focus on other areas like testing, data management and product development services.

Chinese firms also need to implement strict intellectual property controls and undertake training programmes, McCarthy said.

5/24/2007

China-Based Camelot Information Systems Opens U.S. Headquarters in Austin

AUSTIN, Texas--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Camelot Information Systems, LLC, a Chinese-based IT services company, has opened its United States headquarters in Austin, Texas through a partnership with Bridge360, an Austin-headquartered internationalization company. Executives from the company were in Austin to celebrate the opening, May 21-23.

Bridge360 facilitated the legal and business processes for Camelot to set up a U.S. base, which is a mirror image of what Camelot is doing for Bridge360 in Beijing.

We believe it is not just a one-way path to China, said Bridge360 CEO Brenda Hall. The bridge runs in both directions. Our partnership is a perfect fit. Not only are we augmenters of each others services internationalization/globalization and IT infrastructure together, we bring a 360-degree view of the world for our clients.

Simon Ma, CEO of Camelot China concurs, I am very excited to have a partner like Bridge360. The partnership strengthens our front end in the United States to serve our U.S. customers better. Bridge360 and Camelot share many similarities. We have the same beliefs, we have similar ways of taking care of our customers, and the key executives of both companies share a similar background. It is not often that you find a partner that fits so well culturally while complementing each others strengths.

Camelot provides information technology and application services to clients in China and abroad. Headquartered in Beijing, Camelot has six additional branches throughout China and recently expanded to Japan and Taiwan. With more than 1,300 employees, Camelot is Chinas largest ERP SAP provider.

With a strong customer base already established with U.S.-based clients such as P&G, Bayer, BearingPoint, Accenture, IBM, HP, Shell Oil Company, GM, EDS and Kimberly-Clark, Camelot will focus its growth efforts in the United States over the next few years.

Camelot is one of the first Chinese companies to focus on the U.S. market for outsourcing services. The Camelot service offering in the U.S. will include: Outsourcing Services Management, Marketing Services Management and Local Support Services Management.

The United States is obviously one of the most important markets for IT outsourcing. Camelot is committed to invest and nurture this market for the long term, said Ma.

About Camelot

Camelot Information Systems, LLC is an industry leader in China, providing packaged software implementation services, programming and IT support services.

Camelots client base is focused largely in the financial industry, manufacturing, distribution, utilities and telecom. Camelot is Chinas largest ERP SAP provider, and has earned the trust of some of the worlds largest commercial and government organizations.

Camelot is headquartered in Beijing with offices throughout Mainland China as well as Hong Kong, Japan, Taiwan and the United States. Camelot was recognized in 2007 as one of Chinas Top Employers by the Corporate Research Foundation. For more information about Camelot, please visit http://camelotchina.com.

About Bridge360

Bridge360 combines internationalization and localization by focusing at the engineering and architecture level to find and fix any software problems that might threaten a clients business internationally. Bridge360 makes sure its clients software works anywhere in the world in any language and on any operating system.

Bridge360 focuses heavily on Asia and is the leader for certifying software, or products with software, for sale in China. China Certification assures a company's software meets the compliance standards, which are required for distribution in China.

For more information, visit www.bridge360.com.

Is dragon leading the race in BPO space?

NEW DELHI: China's push to become an alternate BPO hub for MNCs tackling soaring wages and high attrition rate in India remains a distant dream as its offshore market is developing slower than expected, a study says.

Despite significant government support and huge level of visibility on the global arena, China's offshore market has not taken off as expected and still has a long way to become a potential alternative to India, technology research firm Forrester said in a report released on Thursday.

Multinational firms, considering China as a "quick-fix" solution to deal with rising costs and high attrition of employees in other offshore locations like India, would be sorely disappointed by the country's slowing offshore momentum, the report said.

"When we first looked at China's offshore and global delivery model nearly two years ago, the country was widely viewed as the key challenger to India for offshore supremacy. However, our latest research shows that to date, the market has not taken off as expected," Forrester's Vice-President John McCarthy said.

McCarthy, who had predicted in 2002 that over three million BPO jobs in the US would go offshore, added that firms with large bases in India should consider other geographies when addressing the risk mitigation issue.

Even countries like the Philippines, Mexico and Brazil could prove to be better alternatives than China for diversifying offshore exposure, McCarthy said.

"The Philippines, Mexico and Brazil may provide better alternatives than China in terms of skills, language and convenience," he added.

Noting that China's percentage of overall offshore resources has dropped and other countries were growing at a faster pace, Forrester said the country needs to refocus its offshore efforts.

Instead of trying to compete in areas like application development and management, where India clearly dominates, China should encourage its local firms to focus on other areas like testing, data management and product development services.

Chinese firms also need to implement strict intellectual property controls and undertake training programmes, McCarthy said.

For other countries vying for the lucrative offshoring pie, Forrester suggests economic development agencies in Thailand, Malaysia, Egypt and Morocco that they need to do more than just re-labelling the pool of engineering graduates as being ready to export their services.

"Their education programmes ought to focus on advanced skills like project management and advanced architecture skills, while at the same time, respective governments should invest significant funds to market the country as an alternative to the offshore incumbent - India," McCarthy said.

China's bid to rival India as BPO destination a "distant dream": Forrester

24 May 2007

New Delhi: China's attempt to emerge an alternate offshoring hub to India's soaring salary levels and high attrition rates, remains a distant dream as its market is developing slower than expected, says a new study by technology research firm, Forrester Research, released today.

Despite massive government support and huge global visibility, China's offshore market has not taken off as on the scale expected and it still has a long way to go to become a potential alternative to India, Forrester said.

Multinational firms, considering China as a "quick-fix" solution to deal with rising costs and high attrition in other offshore locations like India, would be sorely disappointed by the country's slowing offshore momentum, the report said.

John Mccarthy, vice president, Forrester, said, "When we first looked at China's offshore and IT services global delivery model (GDM) nearly two years ago, the country was widely viewed as the key challenger to India for offshore supremacy. However, the market has not taken off as expected."

He said while Japanese firms were more aware about China's potential, those from the US and Europe have been slow to respond. "In fact, China's percentage of GDM resources for top services firm like Accenture has dropped, while India and the Philippines have seen far greater investment," he said.

Mccarthy, who had predicted in 2002 that over three million BPO jobs in the US would go offshore, added that firms with large bases in India should consider other geographies when addressing the risk mitigation issue.

Even countries like the Philippines, Mexico and Brazil could prove to be better alternatives than China for diversifying offshore exposure in terms of skills, language and convenience, he added.

Forrester also said like India, China also faces similar problems of attrition, increasing wages and lack of experienced managers and technical leads. In addition, the appreciation of the yuan against the dollar was hurting margins of companies outsourcing their work to China, the study said.

"The consensus among interviewees was that China still has not overcome clients' concern about limited English skills, attrition and weak intellectual property protection. One executive went so far as to say that China had to be 20 per cent cheaper than India to be viable," it said.

5/23/2007

Survey: IT outsourcing to intensify

Information technology is the most outsourced corporate function and more companies are looking to farm out more work.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers interviewed 226 customers and 66 outsourcing service providers. The survey focused on outsourcing across industries and functions, but there were some interesting kernels that are likely to apply to technology management.

Among PwC’s findings:

  • 57 percent of respondents said they are outsourcing information technology services and 39 percent said they outsource IT to “a significant extent.” And there’s room for expansion as 55 percent of customers said they will expand IT outsourcing.
  • Customers that outsource various functions say they face barriers to making outsourcing deals work. The following responses aren’t specific to IT, but do apply:

45 percent say company values favor using in-house employees;

37 percent say they lack the skills to manage outsourcing pacts;

37 percent say they need to clean up operations before outsourcing them.

  • Not surprisingly there’s a bit of a disconnect between suppliers and customers. For instance, 66 percent of customers say near-shoring works best in the real world. Among suppliers, only 24 percent favored near-shoring. Twenty percent of customers say offshore outsourcing works best while 52 percent of suppliers favor offshore work. Given the labor costs that’s not too surprising.
  • That disconnect continues when it comes to profit margins. Customers say service providers should expect an after tax profit margin of 5 percent to 12 percent. But more than half of the suppliers wanted a range of 15 percent to 25 percent for profit margins.

Among some notable charts:

This one shows where IT stands in the outsourcing pecking order:

outchart1.png

This one addresses what customers say are the most important things to their businesses about outsourcing deals (includes IT and other functions).

outchart2.png

Software outsourcing exceeded USUS$1.4 billion last year

At present, the scope of China's software outsourcing service market has reached US$1.43 billion , up by 55.4 percent from the same period last year. The software outsourcing service has become one new growth point of China's software industry. Xiao Hua, director of the Electronic Products Management Department, in the Ministry of Information Industry (MII), pointed this out at the 2007 China (Wuxi) Software Exports (outsourcing) Forum, held in Wuxi, Jiangxi Province.

According to statistics, the annual growth of China's software outsourcing service market reached 52.1 percent from 2001 to 2004. The value of the market increased from US$180 million in 2001 to US$633 million in 2004. It is predicted that China's software outsourcing services market will develop rapidly with an annual growth rate of 48.4 percent from 2005 to 2009. By 2009, the market value of China's software outsourcing services market will reach US$4.56 billion. The rapid growth of China's software outsourcing service market is profiting from the resuscitation of the international outsourcing market and the gradually maturing, local outsourcing market.

By People's Daily Online

Pharmaceutical Outsourcing’s New Frontiers

Pharmacovigilance and Clinical Data Management

By Vicki Tauscher Phelan and Charles Arnold
EquaTerra



As companies in the pharmaceutical industry continue their drive to reduce costs and enhance efficiency by outsourcing various processes, they are increasingly pursuing newer areas, specifically pharmacovigilance and clinical data management.

Compelled by both external market factors and internal pressures to constrain costs and enhance shareholder value, pharmaceutical firms are turning to these two areas as they seek ways to maximize the resources devoted to their core activities, R&D and getting drugs to market. Shifting this type of work to offshore locations helps them meet that goal.

What may be one of the first significant pharmacovigilance and clinical data management outsourcing deals in the industry was the Bristol-Myers Squibb agreement with Accenture, announced in March, in which the work is being done in India.

Both pharmacovigilance and clinical data management are expensive work, yet because they are process-driven, they are strong candidates for alternative delivery models. The work involves highly-skilled individuals, from registered nurses to specialist doctors who are performing relatively clerical functions, such as sifting through data and probing case reports; but despite the clerical nature of the work, it requires such a high level of expertise that a company must pay dearly for it if the work is done domestically.

The requirements, and the stakes, of this kind of work continue to rise. Each new drug is put under great scrutiny, exacerbated by negative news coverage. The volume of events to be reviewed and addressed is going up at an incredible rate, and of course, so is the cost.
BPO vs. CRO
Because pharmacovigilance is a relatively new function in terms of outsourcing, there are not a large number of providers currently able to do the work. Essentially, there are two classes of providers capable of moving strategically, and quickly, into this space:

• The traditional contract research organizations (CROs), those companies focused on drug development and managing trials through their various steps and processes. These companies, such as Quintiles, Covance, and MDS Pharma Services, are well suited to step up and address pharmacovigilance. From a staffing perspective, they have the right ingredients, with doctors on staff who are focused on the relevant processes.

• The more traditional business process outsourcing (BPO) organizations, particularly those based entirely in India. Examples are Cap Gemini, Tata Consultancy Services, Infosys, and Keane.

India is the most obvious choice for offshore outsourcing of these processes. India-based operations have excellent language skills, good education, and a large number of doctors who are looking for higher-dollar work in a related field. This is another instance in which what is considered in India to be expensive, high-dollar work is, by U.S. standards, inexpensive.

While pharmacovigilance and clinical data management processes can be performed in offshore locations other than India, India’s stability makes it the most appealing locale, as evidenced by the Bristol-Myers Squibb deal. The nature of this work makes it a conservative, risk-management function where extreme care and caution are essential.
Why BPOs Have an Edge
The Bristol-Myers Squibb pharmacovigilance and clinical data management outsourcing deal, as well as the recent outsourcing of clinical data management by GlaxoSmithKline to Tata Consultancy Services, both went to well-established BPO organizations. It is these organizations that are actively recruiting the right people to fill both current and future needs. These providers see that while these areas are somewhat of a niche, they still represent a potentially lucrative market space. They are ramping up their hiring not only of practitioners, but also of the skilled individuals to run the operations.

While CRO organizations at this point are better equipped from a technical standpoint, what they lack are some of the things that make large pharmaceutical organizations most comfortable. While they do have the name brand and a record of established stability within the pharmaceutical industry, in most cases they lack the scale that gives clients the impression that they can ramp up to meet the needs of a huge global account. Even in cases where they do possess the scalability, they are having a difficult time convincing huge potential clients of that fact.

CROs bidding for the additional business are doing so with fees roughly comparable to the large BPOs. This takes the cost issue off the table and ends up pitting them against the BPOs on the “soft” questions such as such as scalability, stability, knowledge transfer, and other areas where they can’t compare with the large, familiar BPOs. However, it is important to note that the CROs are working very hard to close that gap and compete at every level for pharmaceutical firms’ business.
Navigating the New Territory
These newer migrations to outsourcing are quite different, from several perspectives, for a pharmaceutical company considering them. From a sourcing process viewpoint, the current pharmacovigilance and clinical data management landscape is similar to the early days of human resources and finance and accounting outsourcing, when the work was not yet commoditized. Because companies, both pharmaceutical firms and service providers, are contracting for an evolving process, it is harder to forge an agreement due to the difficulty of developing a concrete statement of work.

The relationship, by necessity, becomes much more focused on trust and flexibility. Certainly, the agreement can address specific service levels or performance guarantees, but it must also build in other forms of measurement and management, more qualitative than quantitative.

Governing this type of relationship will also be more cooperative between the company and service provider. Often, there will be one or more individuals from the company working on-site in the provider’s facility, on a daily basis. These individuals will serve a two-fold purpose; one is the day-to-day management of the pharmacovigilance or clinical data management function, the other is to serve as a conduit to the company’s governance team.

The qualitative observations of these individuals will form the basis of the company’s evaluation of the service provider. While some baseline comparisons are possible between the performance of the service provider’s teams with what was done in the past by the company itself, they can only be a starting point due to the rapidly evolving nature of the pharmacovigilance and clinical data management processes.

At the point of selection of a service provider, more emphasis must be placed on the levels of training each provides to its people, scalability, and the comparative rates of turnover. These are key areas that affect not only the choice of service provider, but the shape of ongoing governance.

For these reasons, pharmaceutical companies are making much more use of outside resources as they craft agreements with service providers, build their governance organizations, and manage the agreement over time. Outside advisors with expertise in the market, the nature of the work, and the legal aspects of the relationships are being used extensively both by pharmaceutical organizations and service providers.

Some companies first achieve a comfort level in outsourcing (in areas such as IT, human resources, finance and accounting, procurement, etc.) and then deal directly with their existing providers or additional providers to expand agreements or forge new ones. However, pharmaceutical companies, even those who outsource heavily in other areas, still feel they are treading on new ground when it comes to pharmacovigilance and clinical data management outsourcing.
Conclusion
The outsourcing of pharmacovigilance and clinical data management is a trend that is clearly gaining momentum, as pharmaceutical companies reach deeper into their business processes to reduce costs and enhance performance. We should expect significant acceleration now that the trend-setters are falling into place. As the BPO organizations broaden their footprint in these types of deals, and the CROs strive to compete with the BPOs on equal footing, both types of provider organizations will enhance their operations with the right people. As a result, each successive deal becomes that much easier to win.

About the authors:
Vicki Tauscher Phelan is EquaTerra’s pharmaceutical practice lead, guiding clients in service delivery strategies. She has more than 20 years of expertise in IT, consulting, and outsourcing.

Charles Arnold is EquaTerra’s managing director in the pharmaceutical practice. He has more than a dozen years of consulting and financial management experience, with a particular focus on business and IT strategy.

Pharmaceutical Processing
Advantage Business Media

Outsourcing jobs: Why Dalian is so hot right now

By Robert L. Mitchell on Tue, 05/22/2007 - 9:05am

While U.S. workers may lament the loss of IT jobs to New Delhi and other parts of India, workers there could soon be looking over their shoulders - at China.

India's efforts to educate its large potential workforce and to upgrade the infrastructure to facilitate commerce around outsourcing facilities aren't keeping up with demand, which has outpaced supply by 150 to 200 percent, says Wen Xiao, CIO for BT Business, a business unit of British Telecom. When demand exceeds supply, prices go up - and businesess begin looking elsewhere. For BT and other businesses, the costs of offshoring to India have risen at a rate of 15% per year. "A 15% a year jump is quite a burden," Xiao says, noting that BT alone has some 10,000 contracted workers in India and spends between $500 to $700 million a year on IT offshoring services there.

While prices have been rising, companies have had few alternatives. So BT last year began a pilot project to grow its own outsourcing facility in Dalian, China, hiring on a staff of 70 people. The three projects completed in Dalian last year were so successful that BT is in the process of building up its own facility there and hiring on local programmers as employees. "We are setting up our own captive operation...that will have a huge impact," he says.

Dalian gives BT a much-needed second source for IT offshoring services, but Xiao says the operation could give BT much more than a bargaining chip to play with India's powerful offshoring firms. While China represents less than 10% of all offshoring services in Europe today, Xiao expects it to evolve into a major offshoring base in and of itself in the coming years.

Xiao, who is a native of Beijing, believes that China may have another edge over India. While India is struggling to get roads and bridges built, China is moving apace, he says. "We have a much better infrastructure than India because we invest in infrastructure." China's policymakers believe that if they build the infrastructure the revenue to pay for it will come from the additional taxes gained from economic growth, says Xiao, who returned from a trip to China in March. "The biggest problem's government is they're collecting more taxes than they planned. Twenty percent more. That's the problem they're worried about," he says.

Xiao thinks India will need to make substantial infrastructure investments to stay competitive in the long term. There's a saying in China, he adds: "If you don't have the road you will never get rich."

Outsourcing not the job killer once feared: Statistics Canada

Anne Howland, CanWest News Service

Published: Tuesday, May 22, 2007

OTTAWA - The move by Canadian companies to outsource some of their operations to lower-wage countries such as China and India has not had the effect on domestic employment that many feared, a new study suggests.

There is no clear evidence that "occupations potentially subject to service offshoring displayed smaller employment growth than other occupations in recent years," said Statistics Canada in a report Tuesday.

The agency identified industries with a large share of occupations subject to foreign outsourcing of services, or service offshoring, in 1994 and 1995. Then it compared employment trends in these industries to those observed in other industries between two periods: 1987 to 1995 and 1996 to 2006.

"Overall, the findings suggest that if foreign outsourcing of services has indeed had an impact on Canadian employment, this impact is likely to have been modest so far," said the report.

The findings run contrary to fears that began in the early 1980s, when it was argued that many manufacturing jobs in advanced economies were being lost to developing countries, Statistics Canada noted.

"Recently, some observers have argued that employers now use foreign outsourcing not only for manufactured goods, but also for labour services such as engineering, informatics and payroll administration," the agency said. "Concerns have been expressed that employment growth in these occupations might decline or even stop. The study found little evidence consistent with that view."

A PricewaterhouseCoopers survey from November 2005 found that 39 per cent of respondents in information and communications technology thought the impact of globalization of knowledge work on the Canadian labour force would be bad in both the short and the long term. In other industries, 29 per cent agreed with the IT people that offshoring would be bad for Canadian workers.

According to Tuesday's Statistics Canada study, between 2000 and 2006, employment in occupations potentially affected by service offshoring grew 1.8 per cent per year, on average. Employment in other occupations grew at the same rate, it added.

"While employment grew a solid 2.8 per cent per year in professional occupations potentially subject to service offshoring, it was almost stagnant among clerical occupations potentially subject to service offshoring," the agency said. However, other factors besides outsourcing were likely to blame for the decline in job growth for clerical positions, such as automation of tasks previously performed by clerical employees, Statistics Canada added.

In fact, the study suggested, Canada has actually seen a net gain from the outsourcing trend.

In 2004, Canadian firms imported roughly $18 billion of computer, information and other business services. Of these, roughly $1 billion came from non-OECD countries such as India and China, Statistics Canada said.

At the same time, exports of computer, information and other business services totalled roughly $20 billion. Of this, $3.5 billion went to non-OECD countries, the agency added.

"This indicates that while some Canadian firms were increasingly involved in the foreign outsourcing of services, others were also benefiting from foreign insourcing," the report said.

5/22/2007

india vs. China: The other side of the story

I was asked by a reader, “so why do you think you will win your bet with Benny?” Most of India’s strengths are self-evident and have been widely written up. Here are a couple of thoughts on why I still believe I will win the bet:
  • Be careful what you wish for, or in other words, how China may fall victim to its own success: The Chinese government tends to think big and right now it is trying to start 1000 BPOs by 2010. 1000 is a large enough number that it attracts attention (which by the way is what I think the government was trying to do) but it is too large a number of companies in too short a time for them to learn how to compete smart. If they can’t compete smart, they will compete hard which means they will undercut each other on price and overbid each other on paying workers. Pretty soon they will face the exact same problems India is facing: high employee churn rates, wage inflation and lower margins. The Chinese government has to help Chinese BPOs grow smart rather than just grow fast and that can’t be done by spending money alone.
  • When it comes to quality, perception is as important as reality: While the Chinese BPO industry has existed for years, they have very little experience serving US and European customers and dealing with their quality expectations. The newer Chinese BPOs also tend to have less extensive quality management experience and technologies. [There are exceptions to every rule: I have met some Chinese BPOs who are investing quite heavily on their quality, while others seem to have very few if any quality experts on staff.] Furthermore, often the definition of quality in BPO engagements is quite subjective. If US customers believe that China has a quality problem, they will perceive lower quality in the processes run by Chinese vendors. Indian vendors addressed this quality perception problem by aggressively adopting CMM and reaching CMMI certification levels that were often higher than their customers’. [Look out for an upcoming post on why CMMI is not sufficient for BPO as opposed to IT outsourcing. But the reality is that the market broadly perceives it as a quality certification.] Chinese BPO vendors can’t follow that exact same strategy. The leading Indian BPO vendors have already invested years in reaching the highest levels of CMM. Even after spending years, the Chinese BPOs can at best match the Indian vendors in CMMI certification, not beat them at it.

China labor prices are rising - What it means for outsourcing

By Charlie Barnhart

May 21, 2007

China's labor costs for electronics manufacturing are rising even faster than I thought they would. In my work for the Outsourcing Navigator Series, I see dozens of quotations for manufacturing projects each month, and nearly every one includes a

China estimate.

Based on this information, I've concluded the following:

Before November 2006, China's labor costs were rising 3 to 5 percent per year. Then in November that gradual slope in the cost curve took off like a rocket. The result: For all 2006, costs rose nearly 16 percent with the vast majority of that increase occurring in November and December. In the first three months of 2007, the rate of increase has flattened a bit but has not reversed course. My estimate for 2007: A 10 to 13 percent increase.

At this rate, China's labor costs either have or soon will reach parity with Malaysia and Thailand, thus making Vietnam the lowest labor cost location in Asia.

What does all this mean for your sourcing decisions?

More than ever, OEMs need to refrain from making decisions based on fanciful whim about where they think costs are lowest and start getting the facts - and the facts need to be accurate. Plus, they need to start doing their homework on Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) whenever thinking about China, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam or even Singapore because all of these geographies are becoming progressively intertwined from a regional economic perspective.

Here's the bottom-line:

Rising labor costs in China will inevitably relieve the competitive pressures that have been holding down prices throughout the region so it is reasonable to say that prices throughout Southeast Asia are going to start going up. When and how much - who knows? The best course of action may be for North American OEMs to take at look at Mexico, and Western European OEMs to look toward Eastern Europe.

What impact do you think this will have on global manufacturing? Please post a comment on my weblog.

If you need help with TCO or want to know more about what's going on in Asia and the rest of the world, check out my upcoming Outsourcing Navigator workshop next month in Chicago.

Note from TFI: Quarterly Forum members, have you registered for the June event in Chicago? Planned reports include TFI's annual EMS-ODM industy financial performance analysis, a new study on logistics, and a panel on environmental compliance

5/21/2007

China labor prices are rising - what it means for outsourcing


China’s labor costs for electronics manufacturing are rising even faster than I thought they would. In my work for the Outsourcing Navigator Series, I see dozens of quotations for manufacturing projects each month, and nearly every one includes a China estimate.

Based on this information, I’ve concluded the following:

Before November 2006, China’s labor costs were rising 3 to 5 percent per year. Then in November that gradual slope in the cost curve took off like a rocket. The result: For all 2006, costs rose nearly 16 percent with the vast majority of that increase occurring in November and December. In the first three months of 2007, the rate of increase has flattened a bit but has not reversed course. My estimate for 2007: A 10 to 13 percent increase.

At this rate, China’s labor costs either have or soon will reach parity with Malaysia and Thailand, thus making Vietnam the lowest labor cost location in Asia.

What does all this mean for your sourcing decisions?

More than ever, OEMs need to refrain from making decisions based on fanciful whim about where they think costs are lowest and start getting the facts — and the facts need to be accurate. Plus, they need to start doing their homework on Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) whenever thinking about China, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam or even Singapore because all of these geographies are becoming progressively intertwined from a regional

Here’s the bottom-line:

Rising labor costs in China will inevitably relieve the competitive pressures that have been holding down prices throughout the region so it is reasonable to say that prices throughout Southeast Asia are going to start going up. When and how much — who knows? The best course of action may be for North American OEMs to take at look at Mexico, and Western European OEMs to look toward Eastern Europe.

If you need help with TCO or want to know more about what’s going on in Asia and the rest of the world, check out my upcoming Outsourcing Navigator workshop next month in Chicago.

China targeting outsourcing potential to boost economy


New Delhi, May 19 : China's Jiangsu Province is targetting outsourcing as potential area for economic growth in the next few years.

Zhang Weiguo, the deputy governor of the province, was quoted by The China Daily as saying that a national strategic blueprint to develop the outsourcing industry is being given due consideration by the authorities.



He said the blueprint aims to provide new and diversified modes of economic growth to keep up with global trends and achieve sustainable development.

China's economy has grown rapidly in the last 15 years, and service industry outsourcing has in recent years emerged as a new economic growth point, particularly in Shanghai, Tianjin, Dalian and Shenzhen.

"We have great advantages in technology and human resources to compete and have a big share in the outsourcing service market," Zhang was quoted, as saying.

One of the fastest developing and wealthy provinces in the country, Jiangsu boasts a large number of hi-tech enterprises and companies in information technology, software, electronic information and telecommunications.

Statistics show the province yielded revenue of 200 million dollars from outsourcing services in 2006. Apart from Nanjing, the provincial capital and one of a dozen State-designated outsourcing base cities, six cities - including Suzhou, Wuxi and Changzhou - were recently named provincial-level outsourcing base cities by the provincial department of foreign trade and economy.

Fifty companies out of 1,000 from these cities were chosen to be key outsourcing enterprises.

Get More from Outsourcing

Most of us fear outsourcing, and with reason: Our jobs are on the line. Still, most of us work for organizations that will engage in one or more outsourcing deals. Learning how to deal with the changes outsourcing brings can actually work in our favor. Here are some tips.

Work on the outsourcing relationship. Most companies put little time or effort into these relationships, which soon become little more than a battle over invoices, due dates and other contract-related issues.

It's critical to treat the relationship formally, assigning specific point personnel to handle it (even if at this point you have only a small internal office of the CIO). This is especially critical when most of the people on the "other side" are your own ex-colleagues. You might like the "feel good" factor of seeing your former colleagues continue to identify themselves as members of your team, but beware. I've seen some who still did that 18 years into an outsourcing relationship. The problem is that those people never made the transition to representing their new employer and thus were unable to bring its best thinking to bear on the client's interests.

Focus on the future. Most long-term sourcing transactions go through at least one major contract renegotiation midstream. There's nothing wrong with this—few of us are brilliant enough to anticipate 10 or more years of changing needs. But if you're going to go through a year's worth of renegotiation, why settle for a few minor tweaks in the pricing algorithm and not much more?

It's not enough to enter into renegotiations focused on what has changed about your company's IT needs since you engaged the sourcing firm. Focus on change itself, the inevitable byproduct of passing time. You'll see, for instance, that tying the sourcing partner's resources to the configuration just makes it difficult for the partner to make changes that could save power, servers and other underlying costs. You might also decide to build staff redeployment and retraining into the contract. You could pay a defined sum toward them each year while putting in safeguards that would protect you from paying for severance if the outsourcer must lay off some staffers because of a lack of work. Another idea for renegotiation: Pay the sourcer a bonus for cutting costs more than expected or consistently delivering quality results.

Commit yourself. When you outsource a business process, do it cleanly. I've seen outsourcing relationships in which a single transaction passed back and forth over the sourcing boundary five or six times. Commitment can only come with trust, but it's important to make up your mind that your objectives are indeed trust and commitment. And, make no mistake, a failure to commit shows up as a lack of success—on both sides of the table. Once you have established trust, you will be less concerned that you might be able to get something done a little cheaper through someone else, and you will become comfortable with not spelling out precisely how the partner should do everything. In other words, you will learn to treat the partner like the next department over.

By the end of 2008, more than US$120 billion in outsourcing deals will be up for renewal. Many clients are in deeply unhappy relationships, yet most will end up outsourcing again. Now is the time to hone your ability to form partnerships. You'll be mastering an in-demand skill.

BTO industry to be USD 680 billion by 2008-09

The market potential of the Business Transformation Outsourcing (BTO) industry is expected to be aroundUSD 680 billion by 2008-09 and grow at the rate of five per cent,according to a ASSOCHAM study.
The study said the percentage of BTO services in the outsourcing spectrum was expected to increase from 19 per cent in 2004 to 31 per cent by 2009.
While, West Bengal is considered as one of the favourite IT destinations in the country Kolkata is almost at one of the last rungs of the potential Business Transformation Outsourcing (BTO) ladder, it said.
The study entitled " Business Transformation Outsourcing (BTO):Third Generation Outsourcing," was conducted by Associated Chamber of Commerce and Industry of India recently.
However, cities like Bangalore and Gurgaon have ranked as the most favourite BTO destinations, followed by Delhi, Chennai and Mumbai.
Kolkata has been placed at the sixth position followed by Pune in the seventh rank.
However, the industry gains popularity it was poised to grow at 10 per cent per annum.
The study said as the BTO industry was a normal extension of the BPO industry.
However, the study also pointed out that those cities that were already a BPO hub were most likely to be placed in the top rungs of the ladder.
Availability of quality infrastructure, talent pool, geographic location, local climate and tax benefits available from the local government were the main factors which a BTO layer looks for while setting up its base in a city.

5/19/2007

Now, outsourcing gets personal

NEW DELHI: It's the latest buzzword in outsourcing and soon it may touch your life personally. For outsourcing is fast transforming itself from being a multi-people oriented activity to an individual one.

And the new word for it is PPO or person-to-person outsourcing. Already, it's generating revenue worth $250 million annually worldwide, and by 2015, it's expected to be worth $2 billion.

Interestingly, in India, PPO generates revenue worth $65 million annually, but it's expected to touch $500 million by 2015. An eight-fold increase in nine years at a cumulative growth rate of 26%. Although still in its infancy in India, PPO will take another 3-4 years to establish here.

So what's PPO? It consists of those services that are offshored by individual entrepreneurs who are trying to bootstrap their new organisation as efficiently as possible. With technology advances and the growth of the Net, small offices, home businesses and freelancers can utilise PPO services and generate business.

The new trend has been captured by Alok Aggarwal, chairman, Evalueserve, a global research and analysis firm, in his latest paper, 'Person-to-Person Offshoring - Offshoring of Services Reaches Small Businesses and Homes'. Aggarwal says it's simply a different level in offshoring and not the 'next level' or 'previous level.' "This trend shows that because of lower phone tariffs and internet costs, even freelancers can get on the offshoring bandwagon and make money."

Currently, PPO includes services like online tutoring, website development, graphic designing, software development, writing and translation services, accounting and tax preparation services, architectural services, etc. A paper by Alok Aggarwal, chairman, Evalueserve, a global research and analysis firm, predicts as the trend catches up, more and more consumers will be able to offshore jobs at fairly low cost and deliver on time.

At the moment, there are around five lakh vendors and freelancers from various low-cost countries in the PPO space. Out of these, approximately 30% are from India.

India is also facing competition from traditional outsourcing countries such as Philippines, Russia, Ukraine, Romania, China, Vietnam, even Thailand and Sri Lanka. But we have an edge over others. "The reasons are the same — good English-speaking and analytical skills, etc," says Aggarwal.

As of now, PPO is being done under two business models worldwide. First, direct interaction model where the individual client signs a contract directly with the vendor, who in turn either hires people on a full-or part-time basis or sub-contracts the job.

Although payments can be made through cheques or wire transfers, as the cost of the project is fairly low, clients usually pay through credit cards.

The second is the online marketplace model. Here, vendors enrol in an online marketplace by paying a monthly subscription fee, plus a fixed percentage of the revenue if they win the project. When an individual posts requirements for a new project in the online marketplace, that's communicated to the selected vendor/freelancer.

The client then awards the work to the appropriate person. Aggarwal estimates that currently, there are over 90 online market places.

"Unlike manufacturing, where large companies like Wal-Mart or Target could import from low-wage countries like China or India, inexpensive internet and phone call costs have created a level playing field where even the common man can take advantage of low-cost, white-collar labour around the world," he says. A sign of people power.

5/18/2007

Knowledge process outsourcing will be a growth story: experts

Published: Friday, 18 May, 2007, 01:17 PM Doha Time

CHENNAI: In an office in the southern port city of Chennai, analysts pore over stock market data for a London-based fund company, searching for investment opportunities.
Some 1,900km away in Gurgaon, on the outskirts of Delhi, lawyers have taken over research and patent filing for several Western technology and healthcare companies.
These are examples of knowledge process outsourcing (KPO), a new fad across India, where companies are trying to move up the value chain and away from call centres staffed by young people tutored in American accents.
As well as examining financial data and drafting patents, firms in India are managing payrolls and accounts for Western companies, carrying out market research and doing a host of other high-value tasks.
The knowledge process market in India is worth $2.5bn to $3bn a year, and is likely to grow to $10bn to $12bn by 2012, said Ashish Gupta, chief operating officer of Evalueserve, a knowledge process firm with about 1,500 employees in India, China and Chile.
Driving this boom are huge cost savings for Western companies and bigger fees for Indian companies than they can earn from running call centres. Although salaries in India are rising, they are way below Western wages.
Patent research can be done in India at $50 to $80 an hour, compared with $150 to $350 in the US, said R Sivadas, chief executive of Scope e-Knowledge Centre Pvt Ltd in Chennai, which has clients in publishing, healthcare, and engineering.
Average billing rates in the knowledge process sector are 40 to 50% higher than those in the call centres, said Sivadas, whose company employs 485 people, 95% of them engineers and medical doctors.
“We have just touched the tip of the iceberg. In the next six to eight years, KPO is definitely going to be a growth story,” said Sivadas, whose firm will raise staff to 680 by March 2008.
Another such firm is Sundaram Finance Ltd, which set up a back-office subsidiary six years ago to provide research services to local financial firms and now has 23 clients from Britain, Australia, Singapore and the Middle East who have outsourced jobs like market and data research.
In January, India’s Hinduja TMT Ltd and British-based business consulting and outsourcing firm Centric Consulting Ltd entered into a joint venture with law firm Fox Mandal Little to provide legal outsourcing service.
Indian software majors Infosys Technologies Ltd and Wipro Ltd are also vying for a bigger share of the KPO business.
Infosys made $147.52mn in profit from all business process outsourcing in its most recent fiscal year, 8% of it from these high-value, knowledge tasks.
“I expect knowledge services to continue to grow much faster,” said Amitabh Chaudhry, chief executive and managing director of Infosys’ business process unit. “That’s a very important area for us both from the opportunity perspective and from continuing to push the envelope to improve per capita productivity.”
Wipro’s business process outsourcing unit aims to double the revenue from knowledge services to 40% by 2009.
The growth in knowledge process outsourcing has come on the back of India’s pool of English-speaking talent and its lower wages, but there is a looming shortage in graduates in business management, engineering, financial research, law, accounting and medicine.
“There are two issues in terms of manpower — in quantity, there is no problem, but in terms of quality there is definitely an issue,” Sivadas said.
India produces about half a million technically trained graduates, 300,000 post-graduates and doctoral candidates and 20,000 lawyers every year, but many are unsuitable for direct employment in the industry.
“A lot of time, money and effort are spent in finding right candidates. It’s not as easy as the numbers make it out to be. In this business, you just can’t pick people off the street,” Sivadas said. – Reuters

5/16/2007

11th Annual Outsourcing Excellence Awards

Winners Reveal Insights into Achieving Strategic Business Goals

DALLAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Outsourcing Center, the worlds premier source of information about outsourcing, announced today the following winners of the 2007 Outsourcing Excellence Awards:

Best Partnership        Old Mutual Financial Network and Perot Systems
Best IT Applications Illinois State Toll Highway Authority/Unisys
Best IT Infrastructure Bank of India/HP
Best BPO Louisiana Department of Social Services/ACS
Best EU Thomas Cook UK/Accenture
Best Offshore Nortel Networks/Wipro
Best First Steps Bharti Airtel/Nortel Networks India
Best Financial Services Aon South Africa/Alfinanz
Best Healthcare Brigham and Women's Hospital Department of
Surgery/McKesson Provider Technologies

An independent panel of industry experts evaluated 86 nominated relationships worldwide. The judges rated their partnering approach, how the parties collaborated to achieve mutually beneficial objectives and overcome challenges, and innovative strategies for ensuring mutually aligned interests over the long term, stated Beth Ellyn Rosenthal, Editor, Outsourcing Journal.

The September 1 issue of the Outsourcing Journal (www.outsourcing-journal.com) will feature in-depth articles on each award-winning relationship. Forbes magazine will highlight the winners in its June 4 issue.

Outsourcing is becoming more complex, stated Debra Floyd, COO, Outsourcing Center and director of the awards program. All companies engaging in outsourcing will benefit by reading about the winners lessons learned, keys to success, and collaborative techniques. These relationships achieved notable business outcomes in competitive markets and are exemplary in how they manage their relationships for success.

Winners will be honored at an Oscars-like ceremony in New York City, sail on the Forbes Highlander Yacht, and participate in a best practices educational seminar.

With a little innovation, who needs outsourcing?

(FSB Magazine) -- The shop floor at specialty blades smells like machine oil, but nary a drop of the greasy glop can be seen. The bright, airy room is so quiet that the few scattered workers chat between stations without raising their voices. The robotic cutting machines gleam, the racks on the metal shelves are neatly labeled, the floor is pristine. Since when does the gritty world of small manufacturing look like this?

In its factory nestled in the foothills of the Blue Ridge Mountains in Staunton, Va., Specialty (specialtyblades.com) manufactures millions of blades each year, ranging from scalpels to the serrated versions that cut gas-pump receipts. The profitable company, founded in 1985, expects to see sales of $20 million this year, up 16 percent over 2006. "We are very much a growth company," says CEO Peter Harris, 38.

Harris is not alone. True, Detroit is in a slump and the entire manufacturing sector generated just 12.1 percent of U.S. GDP in 2006, compared with 17.5 percent in 1986. On top of that, manufacturing employment dropped from 17.2 million in 1996 to just over 14 million as of last year.

But manufacturing is showing distinct signs of life at the smaller end of the scale. Between 2000 and 2005 there was a 67 percent increase in manufacturing startups, according to a survey by the Kauffman Foundation (kauffman.org). That's particularly significant when you consider that fully 70 percent of all U.S. manufacturers have fewer than 20 employees. Add it all up, and small-business owners can take some credit for the increase in overall manufacturing sales, which rose by 20 percent between 2002 and 2006, according to census data.

What's driving this resurgence? One word: innovation. Not long ago the default answer to sagging manufacturing profits was to slash labor costs by moving the factory overseas. But many manufacturers now realize that offshoring doesn't always make sense.

After decades of downsizing and capital investment, labor today accounts for just 5 percent to 15 percent of total U.S. manufacturing costs, according to Susan Helper, professor of economic development at Case Western Reserve University's Weatherhead School of Management. Offshore risks include uneven quality control, communication breakdowns because of language barriers, political upheaval, and high transportation costs, not to mention the possibility that the low-cost factory in Guangzhou will steal your intellectual property to build a rival product.

The best small American manufacturers are finding ways to compete on a global scale. They are applying creative tweaks to their manufacturing processes, improving efficiency and lowering production costs. They're relying on theories and technologies that were once the exclusive province of multinationals: rapid prototyping, lean manufacturing, efficient supply chain management and better quality control. It's all about innovation, and in this U.S. entrepreneurs excel.

The best small manufacturers are adept at listening to their clients and finding creative solutions to their needs. The engineers at Specialty Blades design precision cutting devices for varied, usually custom applications. On one recent project they worked closely with a medical-device company to develop a combination scalpel and stapler that slices tissue very neatly close to the staples. The result is a less traumatic procedure, so the patient recovers more quickly. A healthier patient can go home a day early, which makes the hospital happy because squeezing in extra surgical procedures is more profitable than housing patients in recovery.

Specialty's clients are willing to pay premium prices for that level of industry-specific expertise. It's no accident that Specialty earns its highest margins on blades produced in Virginia, although the company sources some low-end products from Shanghai, where it also has a sales office. "If you sell a product that can easily be made today in China, you should expect to absolutely go out of business at light speed," says Harris. "So we focus on products where much of the value comes from the engineering of the specific solution rather than the production cost of the component."

Rapid Deployment

In the hypercompetitive world of modern manufacturing, success often hinges on how fast a company can bring new products to market. Rapid prototyping is a key aspect of this process and one in which many small U.S. manufacturers excel. S&S Cycle (sscycle.com) builds high-performance motorcycle engines and after-market engine components.

Launched in 1958, S&S operates two Wisconsin factories, in LaCrosse and Viola. In 2000 the company invested heavily in cutting-edge manufacturing technology, purchasing two rapid-prototyping machines that create plastic and wax parts.

The new technology has slashed production time at the 350-employee company. Before, S&S sent drawings to a foundry that created a mold and then cast a prototype part. S&S would test the part, make adjustments, resubmit new drawings, and wait for another prototype.

"If you wanted to make a throttle body, for example, the turnaround time could be weeks," explains president Brett Smith, 35. "Now, with the AutoCAD software and the prototype machine, we can have that part in 24 hours."

S&S can now create a plastic air-intake tract, for example, and immediately put the sample part on the engine to check the fit. The part then goes to a foundry, which uses it to make the mold and cast a metal prototype. Developing complex items, such as a crankcase, used to take up to two years from concept to inventoried parts.

The new technology has compressed that cycle to as little as six months and has increased productivity by 50 percent. Smith says revenues at his profitable company have doubled over the past seven years, but won't release the numbers.

Striving For Perfection

Although speed is important, it won't help sell shoddy goods. That's why smart U.S. companies focus relentlessly on quality control. Quality Float Works (metalfloat.com) is not only winning bids against Asian manufacturers but also shipping product to China, Vietnam and eight other countries.

The Schaumberg, Ill., factory makes pump floats, the hollow metal balls used to level the amount of liquid flowing through a pump. The company's floats can be found in everything from automatic coffee dispensers to the pumps that helped drain water from New Orleans after Hurricane Katrina. In 2006 sales rose 25 percent, to $2.2 million.

Quality Float follows stringent ISO 9002 and other manufacturing standards. The firm tests the eyesight of its workers regularly and inspects each part "at least three times before it goes out the door," says CEO Sandra Westlund-Deenihan, whose grandfather founded the family business in 1915 and who describes her age as "forever 21."

Westlund-Deenihan's attention to detail has paid off over the years. The last time a Quality client returned a part for a manufacturing defect was in 1992, and that was only because the client had provided an unclear blueprint specification.

Spatial awareness

Another competitive weapon in the American arsenal: geography. With international shipping costs high, U.S. manufacturers can often outsell foreign competitors on large, heavy items.

Glenn Metalcraft (glennmetalcraft. com) produces metal parts such as giant brake disks for industrial tractors or the huge cones that sit on the bottom of many semitrailers and are used for pouring grain or liquid. You make them by loading a blank of raw metal onto a lathe and then turning, or "spinning," it into the finished product.

Historically workers spun these parts by hand. But in 2002 the company hit a wall as revenues dropped to $3.1 million from $4.7 million the previous year. CEO Joe Glenn, 36, responded by purchasing a customized computer-driven lathe that could handle particularly large metal blanks. "We analyzed what we were good at," Glenn says. "We found that on the larger parts - the thicker stuff - the margins were better, and we had a knack for it."

Glenn Metalcraft also benefited from a shrewd outsourcing strategy. Joe Glenn used to order sheet metal and cut his own metal blanks. But his existing fabrication equipment couldn't handle the larger blanks that the new lathe required.

Instead of investing at least $1 million in new equipment, Glenn dumped his fabricating machines altogether and started buying blanks from fabricators near his factory in Princeton, Minn. Losing the fabricating equipment opened room on the floor for more spinning machines. Glenn retrained his fabricating workers, and now the factory runs three shifts.

Glenn's lathes must be programmed by a skilled technician before each new job. Once a lathe has been programmed, however, the cost of repeat runs drops significantly. That obviously gooses profits. So Glenn started focusing on customers that needed steady just-in-time shipments. The result? Much better utilization of capital equipment.

"Our direct labor costs used to be 25 percent of sales," says Glenn. "Today they're 8 to 9 percent." The company grew 19 percent last year, with revenues of $10 million, and projects 33 percent sales growth in 2007.

Smaller, faster, better

It's impossible for U.S. garment factories to compete with Asian producers, right? Wrong. True, domestic apparel production is down 46 percent since 2000. Lower overseas labor costs account for much of this plunge, but Asian manufacturers also achieve economies of scale by concentrating on huge, relatively uniform product runs.

Megan Summerville, 33, has built a thriving apparel startup on precisely the opposite strategy. Before writing a business plan to expand her small apparel company in Austin, Summerville interviewed more than 40 U.S. designers, manufacturers, and suppliers. She found demand among apparel buyers who needed to place a number of small orders (as few as 16 pieces for each design) rather than a few big orders.

Says Summerville: "These clients were tired of wait times in port, high minimum orders, and samples that were far superior to the actual product received."

Last August, Summerville bought sewing equipment from a defunct lingerie manufacturer. Today the five employees of Sew Sister Fabrics (sewsister.com) crank out a vast range of jobs on 52 separate machines, including single and double needle, serger, zigzag and labeling devices.

Summerville operates the equipment of a much bigger company, but she happily accepts low-volume orders that her larger competitors can't afford to touch. Her typical order is 100 pieces or fewer for a mix of up to six different items, completed in three to four weeks. Revenues are small but growing, Summerville says.

Sew Sister now serves 24 clients, including local designers and a few national retailers. In fact, Summerville was recently forced to turn away several potential clients until she could hire additional employees. But she has no plans to change course. "A lot of folks in this business like to get in the groove of doing the same widget over and over," she notes. "You get faster, but then you box yourself into saying, 'I am just a lingerie manufacturer,' and your other possibilities just collapse."

Find your niche

The larger lesson for small manufacturers? Commodity production equals failure. That's true in most industries, not just apparel. "If you're doing commodity work in steel fabrication today, you're dead," says Drew Greenblatt, 40, CEO of Marlin Steel Wire (marlinwire.com) in Baltimore City, Md.

Greenblatt should know. When he bought Marlin in 1999, the company made wire baskets for bagel shops, and offshore competitors were devouring the market. Marlin's revenues were at $800,000 and falling. Greenblatt realized he could either reinvent the company or watch it fail. He decided to start producing precision baskets for industrial applications.

One major stumbling block: Because Marlin's baskets were all hand-welded, the company was incapable of producing to tight tolerances. So he invested $1.1 million in robotic welding and bending machines run by AutoCAD software. Today Boeing (Charts, Fortune 500), Pfizer (Charts, Fortune 500) and Toyota (Charts) use Marlin baskets to send delicate parts through washing machines and curing ovens.

"With bagel baskets, it's not a big deal if you're half an inch off," he says. "But an engineer at Boeing is not going to tolerate parts slipping out of our baskets."

Greenblatt also hired two engineers and trained them to turn drawings around within 24 hours. "In 50 percent of cases I'm shipping product faster than my competitors are sending a second quote," he says proudly.

Marlin estimates that sales will hit $3.5 million in 2007, up 46 percent from the year before. "I look for the customer who needs product quick, exact and in quantities that aren't huge," Greenblatt concludes. "If you get those three, it's my sweet spot, and I'm going to beat the Chinese guy every day of the week."

Build where you buy

Speed, precision, and flexibility are three keys to success in modern manufacturing. A fourth is the pursuit of an efficient supply chain. Consider American Bicycle Group (ABG: americanbiyclegroup.com) in Chattanooga. ABG produces titanium-frame bicycles and neoprene wetsuits. Because the best titanium it could find comes from the U.S., the company builds bikes at a factory in Ooltewah, Tenn.

Until recently the wetsuits were produced at a factory in California. The world's best neoprene currently comes from a Japanese company called Yamamoto. As a small manufacturer in California, ABG didn't have much pull with Yamamoto.

"When you're only buying 500 meters a year, you can't push them to develop something new," says marketing director Dean Jackson. So ABG outsourced production to a giant wetsuit manufacturer in China that orders Yamamoto neoprene in bulk. Production costs dropped, and ABG finally had some pull with Yamamoto.

"Everyone else had been working with Yamamoto neoprene Type 39," Jackson says. "We asked for Type 40, and our Chinese factory secured usage of that. We were first to market with this new material."

Back at Specialty Blades, Peter Harris is confident that America's small manufacturers will thrive. "Animals are very good at finding ways to make do in tough circumstances," he says. "Companies are no different. Survival is one of the most important instincts in the world, and if there's a way, they'll find it."