6/05/2007

The Father Of Indian Outsourcing

Mumbai, India -

In the days leading up to India's '90s outsourcing boom, one of its pioneers remembers starting presentations to prospective American clients by telling them, "You probably think I travel to the office on a bullock cart."

At a time when India is firmly established on the global map, that line seems outdated, slightly offensive even. But Raman Roy, CEO of outsourcing firm Quatrro, says he often had to pinpoint India on a world map to global clients, who'd heard little of its business potential before the outsourcing industry changed the country's global standing.

The numbers tell the story. The software and services sector employs 1.6 million people, is hungrily looking for more to join the ranks, saw growth rates of above 30% for the last five years and exported products worth about $24 billion last year, a fifth of India's total exports.

Roy, who set up outsourcing centers in India for both American Express (nyse: AXP - news - people ) and General Electric (nyse: GE - news - people ) in the late 1990s, says the robust growth of software and services firms has brought about tremendous changes since. "People now know about India; the industry has gained acceptability," says 49-year-old Roy, who also founded the outsourcing firm Spectramind Services that was acquired by Wipro (nyse: WIT - news - people ) in 2002.

In a conversation with Forbes.com, Roy, who's often called the "father of the Indian BPO [business process outsourcing industry]" talks about the growth of his business baby, the biggest challenge to software services firms and how an industry has changed the way Indians live.

Forbes.com: You've been in this industry since its inception. What's changed?

Roy: There's an acceptance of India globally now. In the late '90s my favorite line at the beginning of a presentation was, "You probably think I come to the office on a bullock cart." People now know about India. There was a time when I sold it by pointing out the country on a world map, showing prospective clients pictures of popular historical monuments.

In the U.S., we were considered dangerous when software and services was a 300,000-strong industry because people saw what a potential threat we could be. Some of those fears have materialized in terms of the growth of Indian firms. But with our companies rapidly expanding abroad, now there's also a realization that outsourcing doesn't hurt the economy.

Indian businesses are far more self-confident today, so there's the ability to experiment and move up the value chain. And they're willing to make large investments globally.

What's different on the domestic front?

When I was setting up the first call center for American Express and went to the government to take bandwidth for operating it, policymakers thought I was into espionage because no one had ever asked for that much bandwidth earlier.

When it came to call centers, we used dedicated lines we bought from service providers. And to route calls from abroad to India, we needed to put international links into public service phone numbers. That was illegal in India. Convincing the government that changing regulations like that one would not hurt its revenues took a lot of running around.

For the same call center, I went to meet bureaucrats after they sat on our application for months. A government official said he could approve a call center, but could not approve a center to handle "incoming and outgoing calls." So we had to print definitions of a call center from the Internet and take them to him to show him that's what a call center did.

There were laws that forbade employing women in jobs after 10 p.m. In each state that we planned on setting up call centers in, we had to persuade its government to change that law.

After the initial hiccups, the government seems to have left your sector alone, and the backlash abroad is a tale of the past. What are the industry's challenges now?

The biggest challenge is the lack of talented manpower. High attrition rates [an average of 12 % to 15%] are the first signs of what will become a big issue. The top five companies spend a combined $1 billion per annum just on new hire training. Unless we upgrade our educational and training systems, we won’t be able to meet the opportunities the industry is creating.

The lack of proper infrastructure is also a problem that we're facing across industries.

The U.S. still accounts for an overwhelming portion of the revenues of India's top outsourcers. How much is that likely to change in the next couple of years?

The U.S. accounts for 75% to 80% of revenues, but if you look at global statistics, about 56% of outsourcing comes from that country. So it is the largest market. Though Indian firms are now seeing plenty of opportunities in Europe as they shift toward services of a higher order.

The first phase was just arbitrage and substitution. But increasingly countries like China are turning to Indian outsourcers because they can't find people domestically. The impact beyond the U.S. is growing as firms move to meet different outsourcing needs--in industries like health care, law and education. Growth depends on our ability to scale up effectively.

Indian software firms are not really known for innovation. Has it suffered because of the focus on services? Is there a move to change that now?

We're still evolving, but as Indian firms move up the services ladder innovation is becoming a requirement. Few companies have a nascent culture of innovation. Is the industry realizing that? Yes. Has it become a trend? No yet, but we're in the early stages of it.

You've started outsourcing units from scratch four times already, and all of them have been successes. What did you do right?

We listened to customers, and that's easy to talk about, but tough to do. We kept changing our models based on exactly what our customers wanted. In the early stages, getting the government to give us a hearing and change laws so we could operate was a big challenge, but now the shoe is on the other foot. If we raise issues, policymakers listen.

We also focused on our employees. In the initial period of call centers, mothers, grandmothers, uncles, aunts would come to meet me looking for assurances that it was OK for their daughters to leave the house at night to come to work. They were worried about what the neighbors would think. I met all these people and talked their concerns through. Today, there are too many young women working to worry about neighbors any longer.

There was no spending power among the college graduates earlier [software firms hire about 70% of their employees straight out of college]. Now when you walk into malls these are the people spending all the money. Tech industry employees don't utilize their money for conspicuous consumption, BPO employees do. I'm not siding with either side, but we've made a fundamental change in spending habits, consumption, the way these people live.

On the global front, where is India's competition coming from?

A few years ago, countries like China, Philippines and Mexico were among the few on the outsourcing radar. Today, there are over a dozen attractive destinations--from Sri Lanka to Malaysia to a host of Eastern European nations. But I don't think there's a big threat, because the outsourcing pie is large and only growing.

Right now, more than half of what is outsourced comes to India. When outsourcing is spoken about, India is spoken about in the same breath. The big challenge is for us to continue to evolve as customers' needs change. We need to now focus on innovation. But the future's looking bright. It's an exciting time to be an Indian in India.

Checklist: Outsourcing in China

Finding a company to outsource with in China is an important undertaking. Our expert offers this checklist of the key factors you need to consider when selecting a partner.

By David Dan, D Square Transformation Consulting -- Electronic Business, 5/29/2007

China is a hot choice for hardware outsourcing, as we've seen three major industrial clusters build a sufficient supply of engineering talent and labor capacity, which are required for the growth of this industry.

Although we have seen more labor-intensive projects move to western provinces, in general China is still quite competitive in this market segment.

Below I have highlighted some of the factors you need to consider when going through the process of evaluating whether or not you should establish an outsourcing program in China.

1. What are your business objectives?

When you are evaluating an outsourcing project, you have to clearly define what your business objectives are. Is this going to be 100% exported from China, or 100% domestic sales inside China? Perhaps your objectives are a mixture of the two. Your objectives matter when you select service providers.

2. What is the service capability you are looking for from your service providers?

Are you looking for a decrease in manufacturing costs, or do you expect your outsourcing service provider to provide more value-add to improve your competitiveness in the marketplace? Consider the following:

  • They may be able to provide ODM design for your none-core or entry-level product-line design.
  • They will be able to work with your engineers to review the BOM (bill of materials) and replace with locally sourced parts at lower material and supply-chain costs under your agreement and approval.
  • They will be able to provide "lean manufacturing capability" to improve productivity.
  • VMI (vendor managed inventory) is another key area of cost saving and improves flexibility.

You do have choices based on the model of cooperation you expect and how far you like to "instruct" instead of "cooperate" with your new outsourcing partners and take advantage of their capabilities.

3. What are the categories of companies in China?

There are several categories of companies you can choose from in China:

  • WOFE (Whole owned by foreign enterprise): These are primarily for export. The majority of CMs (contract manufacturers) or ESMs (electronic service manufacturer) fall into this category.
  • Taiwan/Hong Kong/Singapore companies: This category of company has engineering capabilities (ODM) plus CM (contract manufacturing) capabilities. Again, they are primarily export-oriented.
  • Registered local Chinese companies targeting domestic-market sales (includes joint ventures).

4. Other factors to consider

Size or scale of the company: The right size match is critical for outsourcing success. You should never deal with a company that is so big that you end up with no attention from its executives. On the other hand, you don't want to partner with a company that is too small for you to grow. Flexibility and growth potential should be among your outsourcing objectives beyond cost.

Culture and management fit: You may not like to deal with a very traditional and non-Western management. I have seen US companies engage with a Chinese company where there aren't any English-speaking employees and they count on interpreters to communicate. This may not be the best situation for you to get involved with.

Compatibility, both technically and with experience levels:Make sure the partner can understand what you communicate and can do a good job of implementing your instructions before asking for innovation on technology and process.

Location:This is becoming even more critical for business dynamics and flexibility. There are three major clusters in China with focused industries, and your outsourcing providers should be located in the right cluster to take the advantage of logistics and supply-chain effectiveness. You will find many VMI hubs near these clusters.

Referral, record, and resume: Check with your candidates' existing customers and review the candidate's engineering and project manager's capabilities before you dive into any audit process. Due diligence in this situation is critical and is a key component of your future outsourcing success, especially in China.

Software park targets Japanese outsourcing

SHENZHEN: Hitachi Systems & Services (HSS) signed an agreement with Shenzhen Software Park yesterday to train outsourcing managers targeting the booming Japanese market.

The move will allow the IT-driven southern city to take a slice of the growing software outsourcing business from Japan, the world's second-largest technology market, said Zeng Guozhong, director of Shenzhen Software Park's management office. The park is a Shenzhen government-backed body for the development of the software industry.

The city used to concentrate its efforts on attracting outsourcing business from American and European clients.

The new program with HSS, an arm of Hitachi Group that focuses on providing system integration services, will train 300 professionals by the end of this year, Zeng said.

"HSS has developed a comprehensive and practical training program for software outsourcing, which is not only suitable for the company itself but for other Japanese companies," he noted.

Besides professional and project management courses and case studies, the five-month training program will include the study of the Japanese language, commercial cooperation and negotiation skills in Japanese community.

"These arrangement will help project managers better understand the requirements of the Japanese buyers and facilitate a more efficient cooperation and communication with Japanese technicians," said Cho Jakuko, IT talented person service center manager of HSS's investment in China.

Shinji Muramoto, executive officer of HSS, said the software development business is growing in Japan but the number of professionals is decreasing.

"It's estimated that the number of IT professionals totaled 600,000 seven years ago but has shrunk to about 550,000. Increased business has been outsourced to China, India, South Korea and Vietnam," Muramoto said.

His company has already cooperated with three other Chinese cities - Dalian and Shenyang in Northeast China's Liaoning Province and Jinan in East China's Shandong Province - in training outsourcing professionals.

China is already Japan's biggest software outsourcing base, taking in more than 60 percent of Japan's outsourced software trade in 2006, Mine Shentaro, of the Japan External Trade Organization based in Dalian, was quoted as saying.

Source: China Daily

Outsourcing the news business overseas

Changes around the Monopoly board of news-media ownership make good copy, and who next takes charge of which industry giant may even matter a little. But when it comes to making a real difference in the journalism you see, the question of which coven of the wealthy and willing sits in which boardroom clamoring for more-cheaper-faster matters less than underlying trends in the way the news business operates.

And so to media outsourcing. The topic made a small splash early this month when a citywide Web site in Pasadena, Calif., announced it was hiring a pair of reporters to cover its city council from India. They will watch Internet feeds of meetings. One reporter will be paid $12,000 a year, the other $7,200, no benefits.

"A lot of the routine stuff we do can be done by really talented people in another time zone at much lower wages," James Macpherson, editor and publisher of the Pasadena Now Web site, told The Los Angeles Times. Macpherson, experienced with outsourcing from a previous career making clothes, said he hopes to hire another half-dozen Indian reporters.

Opinions differ as to whether what's being outsourced is truly news reporting, and the Chicago Tribune's public editor, Timothy McNulty, correctly points out that stenography shouldn't be confused with journalism. But this still represents a disquieting development in a movement that has been building momentum worldwide for the past few years:

_In 2004 the global news service Reuters, which is based in Britain, decided to move copy-editing jobs from the United States and Europe to India, aiming to have 10 percent of its workforce there by mid-2006. Reuters was also moving its photo desks in Canada and Washington to Singapore.

_Western book publishers, including Cambridge University, Prentice Hall, Thomson and Macmillan, are increasingly offshoring editorial tasks formerly performed in-house. The Times of India says even the estimable Chicago Manual of Style, an indispensable reference for U.S. wordsmiths, is being produced by Delhi-based TechBooks.

_India's biggest news broadcaster, NDTV, last year entered the outsourcing field, contracting to digitize archives, move content from one format to another (from audio tapes to podcasts, for instance), do closed-captioning, craft-editing, graphics and set design. The company estimates that the 70 percent of all media work that is digital can be contracted out at a cost savings of 20 percent.

_The New Zealand Herald, along with other papers in that country co-owned by Irish publishing magnate Tony O'Reilly, said in March it would outsource copy-editing and layout to an independent outfit in Auckland, eliminating all but a handful of 70 in-house jobs.

_O'Reilly, whose flagship company has 175 newspapers and magazines worldwide, is already outsourcing production editing at his Irish newspapers to local outside firms.

Plainly, the reassuring idea that outsourcing in the information industries - and now, the news business - would naturally be confined to mindless drudge-work is plain wrong.

Reuters, according to a 2005 report in Global Journalist Magazine, began by saying its Bangalore reporters would cover only small businesses ignored by its U.S. staff. Then they started compiling earnings tables for large companies and conducting polling, all tasks formerly handled by U.S. reporters. Next came writing from press releases, culling through Securities and Exchange Commission filings, posting news of breaking announcements. In short, they were replacing not clerks, but reporters.

"The people of India to whom journalistic work is starting to be outsourced are well-educated," Gerard Colby, president of the National Writers Union, told Global Journalist. "I know journalists and writers abroad who are just as professional and proficient as their American colleagues and who are willing to work for much less. They might not understand the (U.S.) idiom, but an editor on our side of the ocean can easily correct their work."

It's ironic that an industry that frets endlessly about its estrangement from the public, that claims to want its workings made transparent, accessible and accountable, would seize on a strategy that makes everything it does more remote, more cumbersome, more unintelligible.

It's even more ironic that a profession that's dedicated to producing work that's richly reported and thoroughly knowledgeable would annihilate whole tiers of support staff that in a traditional newsroom are trusted sources of background, context, taste and memory.

The notion that news arises from a breathing, creative collaboration more like assembling a play than assembling a car seems dreamy and quaint. Whether that's also true may become apparent only in time, as this living business, in its quest for globalized efficiencies, is dismembered.

Major Outsourcers Claim Innovation is Key to Outsourcing Success

DALLAS, June 4 /PRNewswire/ -- At the first annual Alsbridge Outsourcing Leadership Provider Forum held in Dallas, representatives of the leading outsourcing providers offered up their concerns over margin pressures, offshore strategies and the need for innovation. The event included a collaborative session following the Alsbridge proprietary Sourcing Alignment Session (TM) methodology and will result in a new report to be available later this month. Participants included ACS, Accenture, IBM, Capgemini, Cognizant, EDS, ExcellerateHRO, EXL Service, Getronics, HCL, Hewlett-Packard, Infosys, Luxoft, Perot Systems, T-Systems, Virtusa and Wipro.

The SAS process is used by Alsbridge in a sourcing engagement to identify issues and gain consensus on decisions. During the event, process was used with the attendees to collaboratively identify significant challenges and issues facing the outsourcing industry at large as impacting both the client business side and providers' profitability. The process yielded a strong message highlighting the need to find better ways to generate innovation in outsourcing, address the decline in margins of providers as a long-term issue, and improve the sourcing process, contracting, and governance strategies.

"We asked the leaders in global outsourcing to identify the biggest challenge facing the industry," said Ben Trowbridge, president and CEO of Alsbridge. "They said that innovation was expected by clients but lacking, while at the same time that margins have shrunk leaving little capacity to fund innovation."

During the collaborative sessions, the providers said they hear talk about innovation yet the sourcing process and priorities seem to favor decisions based on cost/price and risk mitigation. The buyers push the providers towards commoditization or level playing field approaches that inhibit or prevent innovation. Service levels and performance expectations are not focused enough on business results. Clients often lack C-level attention essential for engagement and innovation, and the client governance approaches are frequently "wrong-sized" or misaligned by either retaining too many micro- managers concerned about activity rather than results, or by not adequately leading client internal change management and priorities.

"One problem is that when providers include change management services in their offers they are frequently forced to remove those offers from scope in order to win a deal," said Barry Weiss, managing director, Alsbridge.

Providers also candidly revealed many of the internal challenges they face and their own contributions to problems in outsourcing. They identified that they struggle to keep pace with technology changes as well as face challenges in meeting global needs for staffing and talent resources, including at the senior account relationship level. Lack of experienced provider-side talent at the client-facing, account level, as well as account leader turnover, contribute to problems.

"During our SAS session, the providers were in agreement on a number of key issues," says Weiss. "Global sourcing challenges for providers include competition for talent, the need to hunt out and gain acceptance for new global delivery locations, and how to structure deals to fairly share global currency, global inflation and geopolitical risks."

Within the deal and sourcing process, providers did not identify any positive contribution to innovation coming generally from either advisors or external counsel. The providers made clear that they would like to see sourcing processes with better ways to achieve mutual alignment of realistic expectations, in a collaborative environment allowing open dialogue with their customers, thus creating more trust. Providers hope for a sourcing process that costs less, takes less time, and focuses better on real business issues. They would also like to see a process that does a better job of setting a framework for effective post-contract change management.

"At Alsbridge, we pride ourselves on working with clients in processes that cultivate innovation and collaborative relationships of trust even as we drive many aspects of sourcing engagements through a time-tested, proven, repeatable and comprehensive methodology that leads to strong deals and optimal pricing and solutions," says Trowbridge. "The SAS brings the best elements of collaborative, strategic planning to the front-end of sourcing projects."

During the event, Alsbridge also introduced its new innovation in assessing the viability of outsourcing contracts and relationships. The Alsbridge Market Reality Assessment (TM) or MRA can quickly score either an existing outsourcing contract or one in negotiation on over 150 common terms and elements. Alsbridge Managing Director Steve Kopp explained, "We built the MRA to help our clients bargain for favorable terms, but we can more intelligently focus our efforts on elements having more leverage so that the bargaining process enhances trust rather than strains it."

Asia-Pacific Business Process Outsourcingmarket to grow 16 per cent

Singapore - The Asia-Pacific's Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) market is expected to be worth 8.3 billion US dollars by the end of this year compared to 7 billion a year earlier, research agency IDC said on Monday.

The market is forecast to grow at a compound annual rate of 16 per cent until 2011 to reach 14.8 billion US dollars, IDC added.

'We can essentially view the BPO market in the region as either

matured or developing, and within that, English-speaking or non English speaking, each with its unique needs and characteristics,' The Business Times quoted Conrad Chang, IDC Asia-Pacific research manager as saying.

BPO end-users are demanding solutions that address their particular needs, Chang said. 'Cookie-cutter approahes will not work in addressing region-specific issues.'

The research agency defines BPO as distinct from normal processing services. Outsourcing services such as checks, credit cards and bill processing are not considered to be BPO activities.

IDC regards BPO as more strategic in nature and involving transformational activities that align a company's outsourcing engagements to corporate objectives.

Challenges facing Singapore are its small domestic market and pool of available talent compared with such countries as India, China and the Philippines.

Increasing competition is coming from Malaysia, Chang told the newspaper.